Project Phase Visualiser.
— Project methodology · 7 stages
From first conversation to AMC.
Pick a project profile and see the realistic timeline across our 7-stage delivery methodology. Hover any stage for the documented deliverables at that gate.
Hover any stage for documented deliverables and timing.
Indicative timeline; we do not promise faster than the work allows. Specific projects may compress or extend each stage based on architect coordination, civil schedule and procurement lead times — every brief gets a written project schedule before contract.
Process · Timeline · Gantt
Pick a project profile and see the realistic Gantt-style timeline across our 7-stage delivery methodology — first conversation through brief, design, procurement, installation, commissioning and AMC.
- Stages
- 7
- Cinema build
- ≈ 16 wks
- Status cadence
- Fortnightly
- Locked at
- Stage 3
· Engineering advisory · Phase Visualiser
What the timeline tells you about delivery risk.
The seven-stage Gantt is the visible artefact; the four notes below frame what the timeline predicts about float, lead-time exposure, commissioning windows and the points where decisions get expensive.
Deployment observations
- The brief-and-design stages are the cheapest to extend and the most expensive to compress — an extra week at brief avoids a four-week re-spec at procurement. The visualiser shows realistic spans; squeezing stage 1 invites scope creep into stages 5-7 where the cost differential is 8-10x.
- Procurement lead-times are the dominant risk variable on premium-spec projects. European audio, fine-pitch LED tiles, addressable fire panels and rack-grade UPS all carry 12-18 week lead times — order long-lead items in parallel with design, not after design freeze.
- Commissioning windows are dictated by the surrounding building programme, not the AV/ELV programme. The visualiser shows a clean two-week commissioning slot; the reality is two weeks of access against a contractor schedule that re-prioritises every Monday.
Commissioning discipline
- Commissioning is not a fixed-duration event — it is iterative against the building's other trades. Allow contingency: a two-week stage 6 estimate becomes three weeks on every project above mid-complexity. The visualiser shows the optimistic case.
Operational notes
- The fortnightly status cadence is the operational discipline that catches drift early. Specify the cadence in the contract; without it, the project drifts to a monthly cadence by week four and a quarterly cadence by week twelve.
- Handover and training is stage 7, but it begins at stage 4 (installation) for any building with a non-trivial operations team. Operations should walk the racks during installation, not first encounter them on training day.
Lifecycle implications
- Stage 3 (design freeze) is the lock — changes after stage 3 cost money, time and trust. The visualiser highlights stage 3 as the decision moment; client governance should be timed against it, not deferred to commissioning.
- The AMC contract is structured during stage 6-7, not after handover — by then the operating context is fresh and the engineering team is on-site. Drafting AMC scope post-handover means re-discovering the building from documentation.
Verification status: Decision support — editorial logic, no numeric claim · Methodology documented · reviewed 2026-08-30
· Engineering notes
How to read this tool’s output
Stage 1 (brief). Use before the first quote conversation to give the client a realistic expectation of timeline.
The assumptions, limits and reference architectures behind this
What an engineer should know
The assumptions behind the numbers this tool produces.
- Maps a typical project across the seven delivery stages with realistic week-by-week Gantt against project profile.
- Lifecycle anchored on the brief → survey → design → BOQ → install → commissioning → handover discipline.
When this tool is the right one
The project moments and room types this is built for.
- Architect briefing on systems-integration timeline for a multi-phase residential.
- Owner setting realistic expectations on commissioning windows.
What changes the answer in practice
Field conditions that move the result away from the planning figure.
- Phased commissioning is common — partial handover at end of phase 1 with full handover at phase n.
Common mistakes
Failure patterns we see on real projects.
- Treating the visualiser timeline as a commitment — actual schedule depends on architect-driven site availability.
What this tool does not do
Deliberate limits — where the estimate stops and design begins.
- Does not produce a project plan — produces a typical timeline visualisation.
Where this tool fits
The building types this output is calibrated for — and, where we have said so, the ones it is not.
Best suited for
The standards and technologies this touches
Reference pages for the protocols, standards and systems behind this tool’s output.
Delivered as a service ·
Multi-System Project Delivery· Why it matters
A premium home cinema runs about sixteen weeks across the seven stages — three for brief and design, six for procurement (most kit is European, some has a real lead time), four for installation against the architect's programme, two for calibration and commissioning, and one for handover and training. A commercial network rolls out faster but with tighter overlap. Knowing where the float is — and where it isn't — is what separates a project from a wish.
· Frequently asked
The seven stages —
what people ask first.
What are the seven stages?
First conversation, written brief, schematic and detailed design, procurement, installation, commissioning and AMC. Each has named deliverables and a sign-off; no stage starts until the previous one is closed in writing.
Can stages run in parallel?
Procurement and installation overlap by design — long-lead European kit is ordered the day the design is signed. Design and brief never overlap; commissioning and installation never overlap. The visualiser shows what is concurrent and what is strictly sequential.
Where do most projects slip?
Stage 4 (procurement) for import-duty and shipping variance, and stage 5 (installation) when civil works are not ready on the date we were told. We track both with a fortnightly written status; surprises are rare, but they exist.
Is the timeline binding?
The visualiser shows realistic ranges, not a contract. The actual programme is locked at stage 3 (detailed design) against the architect's master schedule. Once locked, we hold the dates we sign.
What if the brief changes mid-project?
Change requests are written, priced and signed before they land in the build. Small scope changes (add two cameras, swap an AP model) absorb into the schedule; structural changes (add a new system, change platform) reset the affected stage.
Engineering toolkit
Next in this sequence
Calculators whose inputs or outputs connect to this one.
- Lead intake
Project Brief Wizard
Six structured questions, a written response within two working days. The fastest path to engaging the practice on a real project.
6 questions · 2-day replyOpen - ELV · Surveillance
CCTV Coverage Calculator
Building dimensions and risk profile in, recommended camera count, retention storage and bandwidth out. Densities are planning conventions, not a code rule.
Cameras · TB · MbpsOpen - Hospitality · Systems
Hotel Technology Planner
Pick the property archetype — boutique, 4-star, 5-star, resort — and the planner maps each space (guest floor, lobby, banquet, F&B, spa, BoH) to systems, AP density, AV grade and lifecycle cost.
property × space × systemsOpen
· Begin
Need a delivery plan
for your project?
Send the project profile, the architect's programme and the target handover date. We will write back with a phased plan within two working days.